When and where should we be teaching students about their digital footprint? Part II (March 22, 2009)

After reading some of the other blogs in the class -- particularly science in flower, Eschew Obfuscation, and Martin's COETAIL -- I would like to say more on the topic of when and where educators should be teaching students about their digital footprint and AUPs. As stated in Part I of my blog on this topic, I feel that teachers and parents should both be educating students about the nature of their digital footprint and how to manage their digital footprint in a way that protects them and others (starting with first time online users, children) and allows them to create an online image (starting with MS students) and brand (starting with HS and college students and adults) that contributes to and showcases their learning, accomplishments, values and relationships. Given the wired world kids of today are born into, this education needs to take place at a very young age -- when they first enter the wired world -- both at home and in our schools.

In her blog on the topic, Patience stated that she felt educators (and ISB) need to do more than teach about the "dangers of online life" and that while there was some classroom instruction on the topic taking place at ISB, "these efforts (by teachers 'in-the-know') can not be counted upon to reach all students" she was not sure of the best place ('approach') for these lessons (whether it should be the classroom, freshman seminar, or counseling).

In his blog on the topic, Jonathan stated that he feels "we need to be teaching students from an early age about their digital footprint." and that "ISB’s AUP ... is more a statement of ideas and philosophies, than a policy."

Finally, in his blog on the topic, Martin stated that "Digital footprints are most likely not the domain of any one course and time" nor of just parents or teachers and that classrooms (technology, Humanities and others) are places where he could see this issue addressed recurrently throughout the school years. As for the MS AUP, Martin expressed general satisfaction with its wording in addressing this issue and stated, "it's just a matter (now) of disseminating this information to staff, students, and parents."

Reading these three blogs and others helped me clarify where I feel students should be 'taught' about digital footprints in the schools. And I do think they should be taught. Having a clear and targeted AUP, especially an AUP that staff, students and parents are not familiar with nor invested in, is clearly not sufficient. I believe such instruction belongs appropriately embedded in the curriculum of every class students take K-12, not in a separate technology course, or 'home room', or grade-level seminar. Just as we were asked to embed the NET Standards for Students into our final course project (to combine our unit standards, or outcomes, with the NET-S standards), I think each course, grade-level, or department should be asked to similarly embed 'standards' addressing the safe, responsible and effective management of students' digital footprints. Doing so will allow all students to be effectively 'reached', to allow students to become safe, responsible and effective managers of their own online brand (a 'transportable gift' in the parlance of ISB), and to allow staff and students to feel comfortable enforcing and following a clear and targeted AUP about which both students and teachers are knowledgeable and invested.